ResearchJun 29, 20260 views

Reprogramming parasitic signatures into anticancer peptide candidates: in silico discovery of Leishmania major-derived peptides.

Anticancer peptide research just got a jolt from an unlikely source: Leishmania major. A team out of Iran used a computational pipeline to mine this parasite’s proteins for anticancer peptide (ACP) candidates. The results? Ten non-toxic, non-allergenic peptide sequences with solid in silico anticancer potential, all ready for real-world testing.

P

Amino Acids

by Dehghanian A, Izadi M, Minaei Z et al.

Reprogramming parasitic signatures into anticancer peptide candidates: in silico discovery of Leishmania major-derived peptides. Dehghanian A(#)(1)(2)(3), Izadi M(#)(4)(5), Minaei Z(2)(3), Cheshrokh M(2)(3), Fathi Tadavani F(2)(3), Masoudi A(2)(3), Bagherzadeh MA(2)(3)(6), Mofazzal Jahromi MA(7)(8)(9), Pirestani M(10). Author information: (1)Student Research Committee, Jahrom University of Medical Sciences, Jahrom, Iran. (2)Research Center for Noncommunicable Diseases, Jahrom University of Medical Sciences, Jahrom, Iran. (3)Department of Immunology, School of Medicine, Jahrom University of Medical Sciences, Jahrom, Iran. (4)Student Research Committee, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran. (5)Department of Immunology, School of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran. (6)Department of Advanced Medical Sciences & Technologies, School of Medicine, Jahrom University of Medical Sciences, Jahrom, Iran. (7)Research Center for Noncommunicable Diseases, Jahrom University of Medical Sciences, Jahrom, Iran. alimofazzal@yahoo.com. (8)Department of Immunology, School of Medicine, Jahrom University of Medical Sciences, Jahrom, Iran. alimofazzal@yahoo.com. (9)Department of Advanced Medical Sciences & Technologies, School of Medicine, Jahrom University of Medical Sciences, Jahrom, Iran. alimofazzal@yahoo.com. (10)Parasitology Department, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran. pirestani@modares.ac.ir. (#)Contributed equally This study aims to computationally identify and prioritize anticancer peptide (ACP) candidate sequences derived from the Leishmania major proteins KMP11 and GP63 using an integrated bioinformatics framework that incorporates peptide design, safety assessment, multi-criteria decision-making, and membrane-oriented evaluation. Amino acid sequences of KMP11 and GP63 were obtained from the NCBI database. Peptide fragments ranging from 5 to 25 residues were computationally generated and initially screened for anticancer potential using AntiCP 2.0 and MLACP prediction tools. Candidate peptides were subsequently subjected to systematic amino acid substitutions followed by iterative re-evaluation to optimize predicted anticancer properties. Toxicity, allergenicity, and antigenicity were assessed using TOXINPRED2, ALGPRED2, and VAXIJEN2, respectively. Peptides meeting safety and functional criteria were prioritized using the Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS). Structural modeling, exploratory molecular docking, and membrane interaction analyses were then performed to provide comparative mechanistic insights into membrane association and potential receptor accessibility, rather than to predict specific target binding. Reference datasets of experimentally validated ACPs and non-ACPs were compiled, and motif analysis using MERCI identified sequence patterns associated with anticancer activity, with enriched motifs most frequently observed in the 12-13 residue range. Following iterative screening and safety evaluation, subsets of peptides derived from KMP11 and GP63 were identified as non-toxic and non-allergenic according to in silico prediction tools. These peptides were subsequently prioritized using the TOPSIS multi-criteria decision-making model. The top-ranked candidates were further subjected to exploratory molecular docking against selected cancer-associated receptors and coarse-grained membrane interaction analysis to provide comparative mechanistic context regarding membrane interaction propensity and potential receptor accessibility. Based on integrated computational scoring, ten peptides were prioritized as candidate sequences for further experimental validation. This study demonstrates the feasibility of computationally deriving and prioritizing anticancer peptide candidates from L. major proteins KMP11 and GP63. The proposed framework provides a structured, hypothesis-generating strategy for ACP candidate prioritization, emphasizing comparative evaluation rather than direct prediction of therapeutic efficacy or specific molecular targets. By leveraging evolutionary and physicochemical features associated with host-pathogen interactions, this approach enables systematic exploration of parasite-derived peptide sequence space. Experimental validation will be essential to determine the biological activity, selectivity, and translational relevance of the identified candidates. © 2026. The Author(s). Conflict of interest statement: Declarations. Conflict of interest: The authors declare no competing interests. Ethics approval: This study was performed based on the guidelines of the Medical Ethics Committee of the Jahrom University of Medical Sciences (IR.JUMS.REC.1400.085). The authors declare that ChatGPT version 4.0 (OpenAI, USA) and Grammarly (Grammarly, USA) were used for paraphrasing and editing the final context in accordance with Springer policy. Consent for publication: Not applicable.

The workflow was serious. Researchers started with amino acid sequences from two L. major proteins, KMP11 and GP63. They chopped these into short peptide fragments and ran them through ACP prediction tools like AntiCP 2.0 and MLACP. But they didn’t stop there. Every promising peptide was tweaked and re-tested to squeeze out the best anticancer properties.

Key steps included:

Screening for toxicity (TOXINPRED2), allergenicity (ALGPRED2), and antigenicity (VAXIJEN2)

Prioritizing safe, functional peptides using the TOPSIS multi-criteria model

Structural modeling and membrane interaction analysis to gauge if these peptides could actually hit cancer cell targets

Motif analysis showed ACP-associated patterns clustering around 12-13 residues. After rounds of filtering, the top peptides survived not just for their predicted efficacy, but for their safety and membrane interaction potential.

Key takeaway: Parasite-derived peptides aren’t just weird trivia. With the right bioinformatics toolkit, they’re a rich source for new anticancer research compounds. This kind of systematic, computational approach opens the door to exploring “out there” sequence spaces without the usual guesswork.

Experimental validation is the next step, but the blueprint is set. For researchers looking to push the boundaries of peptide research, this study is a reminder—sometimes the best candidates come from the most unexpected places. Check out our vendor directory if you’re sourcing research compounds for your own work.

For Research Use Only

All content published on Pushing Peptides is intended for educational and informational purposes only. The information provided is not intended as medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Peptides discussed in this article are research compounds and are not approved for human therapeutic use by the FDA or any other regulatory agency. All studies referenced involve animal models or in vitro research unless otherwise stated. Consult a qualified healthcare professional before making any decisions related to your health. Pushing Peptides does not sell peptides — we are a vendor directory and educational resource.