ResearchMay 12, 20260 views

Evaluating the indirect interaction between glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and warfarin using real-world data.

Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) are on fire in peptide research circles. These research peptides are turning heads not just for metabolic effects, but also for their indirect influence on other compounds in active research—like warfarin. A new study out of Utah just dropped some real-world data that’s worth a look if you’re tracking peptide interactions.

P

J Thromb Thrombolysis

by Gilbert SJ, Vazquez SR, Gouripeddi R et al.

Evaluating the indirect interaction between glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and warfarin using real-world data. Gilbert SJ(1)(2)(3), Vazquez SR(1)(3), Gouripeddi R(2)(4), Millar A(2), Facelli JC(2)(4), Witt DM(5)(6). Author information: (1)Pharmacotherapy Department, University of Utah College of Pharmacy, Salt Lake City, UT, 84122, USA. (2)Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, 84122, USA. (3)University of Utah Health Thrombosis Service, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA. (4)Utah Clinical and Translational Science Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA. (5)Pharmacotherapy Department, University of Utah College of Pharmacy, Salt Lake City, UT, 84122, USA. dan.witt@pharm.utah.edu. (6)University of Utah Health Thrombosis Service, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA. dan.witt@pharm.utah.edu. Increasing use of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) raises concern for interactions with warfarin. Although GLP-1 RAs do not affect warfarin pharmacokinetics, their appetite-reducing effects may decrease vitamin K intake and increase International Normalized Ratio (INR) variability. Large-scale real-world data (RWD) are needed to evaluate these effects. To evaluate changes in time-in-therapeutic INR range (TTR) among warfarin patients initiated on GLP-1 RA therapy. This retrospective cohort study evaluated TTR 6 months before and after GLP-1 RA initiation using RWD from the TriNetX Research Network. Included patients were required to have evidence of warfarin use before and after GLP-1 RA initiation. Primary outcomes included changes in TTR, INR, and INR recheck frequency. Secondary outcomes included time below and above the therapeutic range and INR variability. Of 53,943 patients screened, 1,021 met inclusion criteria. Mean TTR decreased by 2.1% (95% CI, -3.7% to -0.6%; p = 0.01), decreasing from 64.2% to 62.1%. Mean INR did not change (0.00; 95% CI, -0.02 to 0.03; p = 0.79). INR recheck frequency increased slightly, with a mean interval decrease of 0.7 days (95% CI -1.4 to 0.0; p = 0.049). Time below therapeutic range increased by 0.8% (p = 0.25), time above therapeutic range increased by 1.3% (p = 0.04), and INR standard deviation increased by 0.03 (p = 0.051). GLP-1 RA initiation was associated with a modest decrease in TTR and increased INR variability among warfarin-treated patients. Clinicians may consider closer INR monitoring following GLP-1 RA initiation. © 2026. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature. Conflict of interest statement: Declarations. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

Here’s the deal: GLP-1 RAs don’t mess with warfarin’s pharmacokinetics. So, no direct interaction. But their notorious appetite-suppressing properties might mess with vitamin K intake, which can throw off warfarin stability. Researchers pulled records from over 53,000 patients, tracking those who started GLP-1 RAs while on warfarin. Only about 1,000 made the cut for analysis.

Key findings:

Time in therapeutic INR range (TTR) dropped by 2.1%. That’s a modest shift, but it’s measurable.

Average INR? Didn’t budge.

INR checks got slightly more frequent—research teams were on top of their monitoring game.

Time spent above and below the therapeutic INR range ticked up a bit, though not by much.

INR variability went up, but just barely missed hitting statistical significance.

What does this mean for peptide research? GLP-1 RAs show a subtle, indirect effect on warfarin control, mostly through downstream behaviors like diet. No direct chaos—just something to track if you’re running multi-compound protocols or designing new studies. This is a win for real-world, data-driven peptide research. Researchers get another piece of the puzzle for how peptides interact with other compounds in complex systems.

Curious about more GLP-1 RA studies or similar research? Check out the peptide research index for deeper dives into the data.

Peptide research keeps pushing forward, and the details keep getting sharper.

For Research Use Only

All content published on Pushing Peptides is intended for educational and informational purposes only. The information provided is not intended as medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Peptides discussed in this article are research compounds and are not approved for human therapeutic use by the FDA or any other regulatory agency. All studies referenced involve animal models or in vitro research unless otherwise stated. Consult a qualified healthcare professional before making any decisions related to your health. Pushing Peptides does not sell peptides — we are a vendor directory and educational resource.